"" Behind Their Lines: But for a Dream

Friday, December 5, 2014

But for a Dream



Irish recruiting poster
In September of 1916, as the Royal Dublin Fusiliers prepared to join the fight at the Battle of the Somme, their leader, a thirty-six year old father, wrote a poem that looked back to Christ’s birth and dedicated it to one of his most precious treasures, his three-year-old daughter, Elizabeth.   

To My Daughter Betty, The Gift of God
Tom Kettle

(Elizabeth Dorothy)

In wiser days, my darling rosebud, blown
To beauty proud as was your mother’s prime,
In that desired, delayed, incredible time,
You’ll ask why I abandoned you, my own,
And the dear heart that was your baby throne,
To dice with death. And oh! they’ll give you rhyme
And reason: some will call the thing sublime,
And some decry it in a knowing tone.
So here, while the mad guns curse overhead,
And tired men sigh with mud for couch and floor,
Know that we fools, now with the foolish dead,
Died not for flag, nor King, nor Emperor,
But for a dream, born in a herdsman's shed,
And for the secret Scripture of the poor.
                 --Thomas Kettle

The poem sits on the knife-edge of the present: it begins by looking to the future, and it ends in reflecting on the past as it wraps present, past, and future into a single vision of purpose. In the first lines, thinking ahead to the future, Tom Kettle anticipates the arrival of “wiser days” when the rosebud matures into beautiful bloom, and his young daughter becomes a woman.  He describes her coming of age as a “desired, delayed, incredible time,” and the steady rhythm of the alliterative ‘d,” holds together the sense of growing up both too quickly and too slowly, all of the changes unbelievable as they unfold and unfurl like the petals of the rose. 

Kettle envisions his daughter's questions about her father and his motivations for leaving her to die fighting for Britain in a war that wasn’t popular in Ireland.  Anticipating that others will try to twist his motivations to suit their agendas, he composes his personal answer to his daughter-of-the-future in the second half of the poem, shaping beauty and meaning out of a war that offered little of either. 
WWI Recruiting Poster
© IWM (Art.IWM PST 13638)

Kettle wants his daughter to know that he didn’t die for a country, but “for a dream,” for tidings of great joy and reconciliation that were revealed in a humble stable, that were for all people, but especially for the poor in spirit, for the humble who are promised the kingdom of heaven.  And looking again at the title, one can admire the perfect rightness and double meaning of “The Gift of God,” recalling both his daughter and the baby born in the “herdsmen shed.” 

Kettle’s wife, Mary, wrote “What chiefly appealed to him in Catholicity was its mystery and its gospel of mercy.  He abjured the self-righteous who, he used to say, went round as if they were “live monuments erected by God in honour of the Ten Commandments.” 

Writing about the Western Front, a place that seemed very far from heaven, mystery, and mercy, Kettle penned an essay “Silhouettes from the Front”:  “…Over there in front across No Man’s Land there are shell-holes and unburied men.  Strange things happen there.  Patrols and counterpatrols come and go.  There are two sinister fences of barbed wire, on the barbs of which blood-stained strips of uniform and fragments more sinister have been known to hang uncollected for a long time.  The air is shaken with diabolical reverberations; it is stabbed with malign illumination as the Very lights shoot up, broaden to a blaze, and go out.” 

This is a man who knows war, yet still believes in the dream. 

In late July of 1916, he wrote to his wife, Mary Sheehy Kettle (who was adored by the adolescent James Joyce and believed to be the model for the young female character in the short story “Araby” and for Miss Ivors in “The Dead”), “What impresses and moves me above all is the amazing faith, patience and courage of the men.  To me it is not a sort of looking-down-on but rather a looking-up-to appreciation of them.  I pray and pray and am afraid! –they go quietly and heroically on.  God bless them and make me less inferior to them.”

And a few weeks later, again in a letter to his wife, he wrote, “....If God spares me I shall accept it as a special mission to preach love and peace for the rest of my life.  If He does not, I know now in my heart that for anyone who is dead but who has loved enough, there is provided some way of piercing the veils of death and abiding close to those whom he has loved till that end which is the beginning.  I want to live, too, to use all my powers of thinking, writing and working to drive out of civilization this foul thing called War and to put in its place understanding and comradeship….” 

In his last letter to Mary, Tom Kettle said, “The long-expected is now close to hand.  I was at Mass and Communion this morning at 6 o.c., the camp is broken up, and the column is about to move.  It is no longer indiscreet to say that we are to take part in one of the biggest attacks of the war.  Many will not come back.  Should that be God’s design for me you will not receive this letter until afterwards.  I want to thank you for the love and kindness you spent and all but wasted on me.  There was never in all the world a dearer woman or a more perfect wife and adorable mother.  My heart cries for you and Betty whom I may never see again.  I think even that it is perhaps better that I should not see you again.  God bless and keep you!  If the last sacrifice is ordained think that in the end I wiped out all the old stains. Tell Betty her daddy was a soldier and died as one.  My love, now at last clean will find a way to you…”

Four days after writing the poem, Kettle and his men were ordered “over the top” in an assault on the German lines.  He was shot nearly immediately, and a friend wrote of the moment, “…he only lasted about one minute, and he had my crucifix in his hands.  Then Boyd took all the papers and things out of Tom’s pockets in order to keep them for Mrs. Kettle, but poor Boyd was blown to atoms in a few minutes.  The Welsh Guards buried Mr. Kettle’s remains.” 








17 comments:

  1. What a fine entry on the humble Irish poet Tom Kettle.
    As many, Tom finally decided to team up with the BEF, answering the call to go out and take a stance for the sake of freedom. In so doing, he left his beloved land and fought wearing the tunic and colours of a country that his Ireland considered to be an occupant. Neither did the War implement the cherished Irish wish to acquire greater freedom.
    Far from being a self-proclaimed hero, Tom Kettle - how Irish can an Irish name be? - was a humble man and a true companion to his comrades.
    Sadly his work has gone disregarded since that War even if his words speak out a truth which has remained unimpaired to the present day and age, when the world is beset with all manner of troubles and disharmony.
    Particularly the introductory line, which he directs to his 'rosebud darling child' and the final couplet, which expresses the fond but humble wish for a better life for the poor, are deeply appealing words. One might wish that, 100 years on, his perspectives might finally unfold, pointing towards global harmony, peace and social justice.

    This 'Kettle' is a choice which I feel I cherish.
    Thanks so much, Connie, and please keep up the good work.
    Warm regards from Flanders!
    Chris

    ReplyDelete
  2. I share your admiration for Tom Kettle and his poetry; thanks for your encouragement!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tom Kettle and his comrades were fooled by Britain's false promise of Home Rule for Ireland when the war was over.

    The First Wo3rld War was NOT fought for the "freedom of small nations". It was a struggle between the major European powers to consolidate their own positions on the world stage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for reading and responding, Frank, and for pointing out that many men changed their ideas about why the war was being fought.

      Delete
    2. Frank, being an Irish republican, I've always found the thoughts of Tom Kettle compelling. He was not a sheep, he had no interest in becoming a british neo-colonial (unlike Redmond), he enlisted because he saw himself as a european, first and foremost. He spoke french and german to a high level, travelled in Belgium and witnessed first hand the rise of german militarism. No, he was no friend of the british, but he reasoned that the defence of Belgium was a higher duty as a european at that moment. He further said that Ireland had to think of itself as a european country and begin to learn their languages, if it was ever to be more than a british sidekick. In this he was not so different from Thomas McDonough, who was a personal friend (he even sais he would have died for McDonagh).
      In a very real way, Ireland's transition to thinking of itself as a european country, and moving beyond its fixation/obsession with the UK and the rest of the anglophone world, is due to people like Kettle and McDonagh in equal measure.
      I'd venture that all this puts Kettle among the most credible of the "war poets". Here is an introduction to his views:
      https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/heritage/tom-kettle-in-memory-100-years-after-death-at-the-somme-1.2786003

      Connie, the humilty and humanity of the poem is astonishing every time i read it, thanks for putting it up.

      Delete
    3. Thank you for your thoughtful response and for sharing the link to the story in the Irish Times.

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Does anyone have a reference for the correct text of 'Reason in Rhyme'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's in my copy of Kettle's posthumously published poetry book "Poems & Parodies" (Dublin, Talbot Press, 1916). The poem "Reason in Rhyme" appears on pages 61-66.

      Delete
  7. Many thanks for that. I shall look for a copy. Much obliged.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm fairly certain there is a modern reprint of the book as well -- best of luck in your search.

      Delete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have found an online digital copy of the London, Duckworth edition 1916 but I will search for a modern copy. Do you have any insights into what TMK was trying to say. I take the work to be an attempt at reconciliation - would you say that was correct?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've not worked closely with this poem, but I think a key may be found in the writings of Will Watson. Do you know his book "The Man Who Saw and Other Poems Arising out of the War?"

      Delete
  10. Being Irish and from the North, I've always thought that the airbrushing of Ireland's contribution to the war was a form of amnesia. At school I learned and loved the poems of Wilfred Owen and other famous war poets. This poem is beautiful and moving and as a proud Irish Catholic teacher in England, the one I read at assemblies on Remembrance Day. Look at the Cenotaph in the Diamond in Derry. We know Protestants sacrificed themselves. But on the Derry cenotaph the names are mainly Irish Catholic. Bless them all. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this information on Derry's Cenotaph (hoping to visit someday), for your insights, and for reading and responding.

      Delete