Mock trial of conscientious objector, 1916 |
“To become a
conscientious objector in 1916 was a difficult decision, which apparently
involved rejecting the whole of conventional British society and everything it
stood for.”
—Margaret
Brooks, “Conscientious Objectors in Their Own Words”†
When Britain
instituted mandatory conscription with the Military Service Act of 1916, conscientious
objectors were allowed to apply to local tribunals to request exemption from
military service. Yet often those seeking
exemption as conscientious objectors “were mocked and vilified by the
press and public, were ostracised by friends and family, sacked from jobs,
imprisoned and physically brutalised. To
most people, they were seen as shirkers, cowards, and even traitors.”*
Tribunals
granted few exemptions: approximately 16,000 men were recorded as conscientious
objectors in Britain in the First World War, compared to the six million men
who served in the military. The British Imperial War Museum website notes,
however, that “the impact of these men
on public opinion and on future governments was to be profound.Ӡ Over one-third of conscientious objectors were
imprisoned at least once;† many were assigned to non-military manual labor work
in support of the war effort.
Gerald Shove was
a graduate of King’s College at Cambridge, a close friend of the economist John
Maynard Keynes, and a life-long pacifist. He met his future wife, the poet Fredegond Maitland, at
a tea party in 1914, where the two spent the evening discussing the war. The couple became engaged the same week that Rupert
Brooke, a Cambridge friend of Shove’s, died on his way to Gallipoli.**
Although Shove likely
would have been granted exemption from military service on medical grounds, he
applied for conscientious objector status and was assigned to agricultural
work. Fredegond writes of that time,
…the war was only then reaching its peak
of horror and our life had suddenly grown very strenuous and anxious. We got out of bed when the alarm-clock said
that it was five o’clock, and Gerald uncomplaining set forth across the fields
to his new work. He returned at dusk,
but I used, of course, to walk over to the farm with packages of food and I
used always to be terrified that he would collapse under the strain of the work
(33).**
In her poem “The
Farmer, 1917” it seems likely Fredegond Shove took her husband as her inspiration
for the “solemn and uncompromising form” of the solitary man in the fields.
Gerald Shove, 1917 by Lady Ottoline Morrell ©NPGAx140525 |
The Farmer, 1917.
I see a farmer walking by himself
In the ploughed field, returning like the day
To his dark nest. The plovers circle round
In the gray sky; the blackbird calls; the thrush
Still sings—but all the rest have gone to sleep.
I see the farmer coming up the field,
Where the new corn is sown, but not yet sprung;
He seems to be the only man alive
And thinking through the twilight of this world.
I know that there is war behind those hills,
And I surmise, but cannot see the dead,
And cannot see the living in their midst—
So awfully and madly knit with death.
I cannot feel, but know that there is war,
And has been now for three eternal years,
Behind the subtle cinctures of those hills.
I see the farmer coming up the field,
I see a farmer walking by himself
In the ploughed field, returning like the day
To his dark nest. The plovers circle round
In the gray sky; the blackbird calls; the thrush
Still sings—but all the rest have gone to sleep.
I see the farmer coming up the field,
Where the new corn is sown, but not yet sprung;
He seems to be the only man alive
And thinking through the twilight of this world.
I know that there is war behind those hills,
And I surmise, but cannot see the dead,
And cannot see the living in their midst—
So awfully and madly knit with death.
I cannot feel, but know that there is war,
And has been now for three eternal years,
Behind the subtle cinctures of those hills.
I see the farmer coming up the field,
And as I look, imagination lifts
The sullen veil of alternating cloud,
And I am stunned by what I see behind
His solemn and uncompromising form:
Wide hosts of men who once could walk like him
In freedom, quite alone with night and day,
Uncounted shapes of living flesh and bone,
Worn dull, quenched dry, gone blind and sick, with war;
And they are him and he is one with them;
They see him as he travels up the field.
O God, how lonely freedom seems to-day!
O single farmer walking through the world,
They bless the seed in you that earth shall reap,
When they, their countless lives, and all their thoughts,
Lie scattered by the storm: when peace shall come
With stillness, and long shivers, after death.
The sullen veil of alternating cloud,
And I am stunned by what I see behind
His solemn and uncompromising form:
Wide hosts of men who once could walk like him
In freedom, quite alone with night and day,
Uncounted shapes of living flesh and bone,
Worn dull, quenched dry, gone blind and sick, with war;
And they are him and he is one with them;
They see him as he travels up the field.
O God, how lonely freedom seems to-day!
O single farmer walking through the world,
They bless the seed in you that earth shall reap,
When they, their countless lives, and all their thoughts,
Lie scattered by the storm: when peace shall come
With stillness, and long shivers, after death.
--Fredegond Shove
The poem describes
a moment at the close of day when under a gray sky, a farmer returns “to his
dark nest” in the twilight of the world. The hills rise up around him as a cincture,
the rope belt worn by priests and associated with spiritual watchfulness and
self-mastery.
US World War I poster |
The careful pattern
of repetitions (“I see the farmer”) marks the man as isolated and also mirrors
the deliberate decisiveness required of men who identified as conscientious
objectors. While the first nine lines of
the poem emphasis the farmer’s alienation – in a world that has seen millions
of men march off to war, “he seems to be the only man alive” – the poet’s
imagination “lifts the sullen veil of alternating cloud.” Stunningly, what is
revealed is the deep connection between the solitary farmer and the “Wide hosts
of men…/ Worn dull, quenched dry, gone blind and sick, with war.”
Together, the
farmer and the fighters have been “awfully and madly knit with death.” They
fight for him; he farms for them so that they can continue to fight. In a war that
has dragged on for “three eternal years,” they are linked to one another in
their loneliness and in their courage: “they are him and he is one with them.”
The close of the
poem looks to a future, perhaps far distant.
If peace comes, it will arrive “With stillness, and long shivers” after
the incomprehensible loss of “countless lives, and all their thoughts.” And yet
the fighting men bless the farmer for the hope he scatters: in the metaphor of
seed lies the promise of birth and future sustenance.
Fredegond Maitland
Shove was a niece by marriage of composer Ralph Vaughan Williams (he set four
of her poems to music), and she was a cousin of Virginia Woolf (the two were
quite close until Shove’s conversion to Catholicism in 1927). She was also the first female poet included
in the Georgian Poetry anthologies, her
work selected for the 1918-1918 volume (the poetry of Charlotte
Mew, Rose
Macaulay, and Edith
Sitwell had also been considered). It has been suggested that
if not for her connections and her gender, her poem “The Farmer, 1917” would not
have appeared in anthologies of the time. And yet if
understood as a reflection upon conscientious objectors, “The Farmer, 1917” powerfully addresses an aspect of the war that is often forgotten.
Fredegond Maitland Shove |
†From the web site of the Imperial War
Museum, “Conscientious
Objectors in their Own Words,” by Margaret
Brooks.
*Ann Kramer, Conscientious Objectors of the First World War, Pen and Sword, 2014, p. 1.
**Fredegond and Gerald Shove, by Fredegond Shove. Privately printed, 1952.
Another fine "conchi" poem was written by poetess Edna St Vincent Millay.
ReplyDeleteI used it for my WWI poetry anthology.
You may be aware that, at least in England, conscientious objection emerged rather clearly among Quakers.
Here is Edna's poem, of thee same title as your heading.
Cheers,
Chris
I shall die, but
that is all that I shall do for Death.
I hear him leading his horse out of the stall;
I hear the clatter on the barn-floor.
He is in haste; he has business in Cuba,
business in the Balkans, many calls to make this morning.
But I will not hold the bridle
while he clinches the girth.
And he may mount by himself:
I will not give him a leg up.
Though he flick my shoulders with his whip,
I will not tell him which way the fox ran.
With his hoof on my breast, I will not tell him where
the black boy hides in the swamp.
I shall die, but that is all that I shall do for Death;
I am not on his pay-roll.
I will not tell him the whereabout of my friends
nor of my enemies either.
Though he promise me much,
I will not map him the route to any man's door.
Am I a spy in the land of the living,
that I should deliver men to Death?
Brother, the password and the plans of our city
are safe with me; never through me Shall you be overcome.
Edna St. Vincent Millay
Wonderful poem, Chris -- the breadth of your knowledge is inspiring!
Delete