Wednesday, November 16, 2016

We know

Rail track at Beaucourt, National Library Scotland, D619
The battle of the Somme began on July 1, 1916; the death and misery lasted until November 18th of that year. Sidney Rogerson, an officer with the 2nd battalion of the West Yorkshires, described conditions on the Somme in November of 1916:
I had not gone twenty yards before I encountered the mud, mud which was unique even for the Somme. It was like walking through caramel. At every step the foot stuck fast, and was only wrenched out by a determined effort, bringing away with it several pounds of earth till legs ached in every muscle. No one could struggle through that mud for more than a few yards without rest. Terrible in its clinging consistency, it was the arbiter of destiny, the supreme enemy, paralysing and mocking English and German alike. Distances were measured not in yards but in mud.*
Cemetery at Beaumont-Hamel
From November 13-18, in what has been called the “last shove of the Big Push,” British troops launched their final offensive: the Battle of Ancre. The week-long bombardment before the attack was staggering, with artillery fire twice as heavy as that preceding the July 1st offensive. Although the attack was considered a success – the towns of St. Pierre Divion, Beaumont Hamel, and Beaucourt were taken – the gains came at great cost: over 22,000 British troops were killed or wounded. 
A.P. Herbert was a young officer with the Royal Naval Division (RND).  His unit was virtually obliterated in the fighting at Beaucourt: of the 435 men who attacked the village, only 20 escaped serious injury or death and were able to continue the fight the following day.  Herbert was one of the twenty; his poem “Beaucourt Revisited” recounts the haunted memories of a survivor.
Beaucourt Revisited
I wandered up to Beaucourt; I took the river track,
And saw the lines we lived in before the Boche went back;
But Peace was now in Pottage, the front was far ahead,

The front had journeyed Eastward, and only left the dead. 

And I thought, how long we lay there, and watched across the wire,
While guns roared round the valley, and set the skies afire!
But now there are homes in HAMEL and tents in the Vale of Hell,

And a camp at suicide corner, where half a regiment fell. 

The new troops follow after, and tread the land we won,
To them 'tis so much hill-side re-wrested from the Hun
We only walk with reverence this sullen mile of mud;

The shell-holes hold our history, and half of them our blood. 

Here, at the head of Peche Street, 'twas death to show your face;
To me it seemed like magic to linger in the place;
For me how many spirits hung around the Kentish Caves,

But the new men see no spirits – they only see the graves. 

I found the half-dug ditches we fashioned for the fight,
We lost a score of men there –  young James was killed that night;

I saw the star shells staring, I heard the bullets hail,
But the new troops pass unheeding – they never heard the tale. 

I crossed the blood-red ribbon, that once was No-Man's Land,
I saw a misty daybreak and a creeping minute-hand;
And here the lads went over, and there was Harmsworth shot,

And here was William lying – but the new men know them not. 

And I said, "There is still the river, and still the stiff, stark trees,
To treasure here our story, but there are only these";
But under the white wood crosses the dead men answered low,

" The new men know not BEAUCOURT, but we are here – we know."
             A.P. Herbert

Sober and reflective, the poem tells of a soldier who passes the scene of an earlier battle. In the First World War, trench lines hardly moved at all, and so it was not uncommon for battles to be fought repeatedly over the same ground (Edmund Blunden’s poem “Festubert, 1916” also revisits the site of a previous battle and is a thought-provoking companion piece to Herbert’s poem). 

Ancre British cemetery
Although the Front has moved on, the dead have been left behind, and in a series of disorienting flashbacks, the horrors of the past are superimposed upon the present. The speaker sees again the places where “young James was killed,” where Harmsworth fell under gunfire, and where William lay dying, but these scenes of helpless tragedy are now situated well behind the front. Camp sites, homes, and tents have been erected, and only the rows of grave crosses give any hint of the hell that men endured here.

New recruits have been brought up to replace the dead of the earlier battle, but the fresh troops “pass unheeding,” neither wanting nor needing to know the personal stories of those who will never return home nor join the fight again. But the survivor remembers: he lives alone in a surreal world of memory. 

Edwin Dyett
One of the stories that haunted Herbert was that of a fellow officer who was court martialed for failing in his duty in the attack at Beaucourt.  After the war, Herbert published a novel heavily drawing upon his own experiences, The Secret Battle. The novel tells of Harry Penrose, a young officer whose nerves fail him during an attack. Court-martialed for desertion, Penrose is found guilty and shot at dawn for cowardice. His story is almost certainly based upon the true account of twenty-one-year-old Edwin Dyett, also an officer of the RND who was shot by men from his own unit. Blindfolded and tied to a stake, Dyett's last words were, “Well, boys, goodbye.  For God's sake, shoot straight.” 

In his novel, Herbert writes,

Dyett's grave: "If Doing Well Ye Suffer,
This is Acceptable with God"
And if the Court had been able to imagine themselves in Harry’s condition of mind and body, crouching in the wet dark under that bank, faint with weariness and fear, shaken with those blinding, tearing concussions, not knowing what they should do, or what they could do, perhaps they would have said in their hearts, ‘I will believe that story.’ But they could not imagine it.  For they were naturally stout-hearted men, and they had not seen too much war. They were not young enough.**

As Herbert so poignantly argues in his novel and in the poem “Beaucourt Revisited,” perhaps it is only the young and the dead who can fully grasp the hard truths of war.

*Rogerson,  Twelve Days on the Somme: A Memoir of the Trenches, 1916.  Mary Borden’s “Song of the Mud” is another source that vividly describes the mud on the Western Front as a hungry, living thing. 
**Herbert, The Secret Battle, pp. 250-251.


  1. Many thanks for this piece. I love this Herbert poem and have walked the ground of this attack. Its extraordinary that the regiment has so much changed in a few short months by dint of the churn of men and the forward movement of the fighting line. Only last night I heard a reading of Vere Harmsworth's moving and gallant last letter home on tv - his leading of the attack and 2 woundings prior to his death surely deserved a gallantry award but many were heroes on these days I guess. I have visited Dyett's grave - one of only 2 officers to be shot? He was no coward.

    1. Many thanks for sharing your experience; it must have been something to have walked the ground of this attack. Certainly Herbert didn't think Dyett was a coward.

  2. Yes, it's a privilege to walk the ground and I was assisted by the brilliant Linesman programme that overlays the original trench maps onto your tablet's modern map so believe I got to within a few yards of where Harmsworth fell.. Herbert was such a great writer . many have said that a man has only so much nerve and it dribbles away until it is absolutely depleted and gone. Whisky papered over the cracks for many an officer - Dyett very unlucky.

  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  4. Thank you Connie for remembering this poet and facilitating an opportunity to take us back to walk in his steps. We should tread carefully in any place we go and remember that each step we take crosses the paths of others. We can't easily step back in time as walk the roads that the weary trod. "We Will Remember Them!" Dyett would have likely numbered among the dead, had he gone over the top earlier. The suffering that haunted him was with him to the end, he was selfless to the end as his final concern was that the boys did not see him suffer too.

  5. Thank you, Alan, for reading and for your thoughtful comments.